Thursday, 27 February 2014

Almost Famous (2000)

Date Watched: 27th February 2014:



KamI don’t know why I don’t like this film. Hannah seems to love it but I just can’t bring myself round to being positive about it. I like music, I like music journalism and I like the legends you get around the music scene so this should be my film right?  But it isn’t, it just annoys me. Maybe it’s because it’s set in an era unfamiliar to me. Maybe it’s because the band we follow is fictional.

24 Hour Party People for example has a similar theme- the story of the music industry at a particular moment in time. I like 24 Hour Party People because the bands and people are real so when Shaun Ryder feeds rat  poison to pigeons I laugh because I can imagine him actually doing it (not that I’d condone it). In Almost Famous, when the fictional rock stars are doing their rock star thing, it seems clichéd. To me anyway.

After checking the IMDB trivia for the film, I read that Brad Pitt was originally cast in one of the lead roles and after months of working on the film, he left stating that he just didn’t get it. I think that sums up my feelings towards the film perfectly. I always knew Brad and I had a connection.


In a nutshell- Almost OK


Hannah: I love this era, I love the clothes, I love the freedom. I wish I was there.

If you tried to make a film set in today’s world about a couple of underage teenagers following round middle-aged rock stars it would be very sinister indeed.

Ultimately this film is fun, easy to watch and makes me happy!

I’m of the opinion that the only reason Kam doesn't like this film is because I do…and this is some Alien revenge. If he thinks this is clichéd then I’m pretty pleased we own Rockstar!

P.s- HOLD ME CLOSER TINY DANCER


Score:












NB- it has been pointed out that Penny Lane maybe older than 16... depending on whether you take her literally.

Alien Resurrection (1994)

Date Watched: Sunday 23rd February 2014




KamRipley has finally lost her marbles.

This is the most interesting film in the series for me, quite quirky and very different from the previous films and like Alien3, the most interesting part is Ripley’s character development. Ok so she’s not Ripley in the strictest sense which allows them to have some fun with the character. It seems Sigourney Weaver has grown tired with the Ripley of old and embraced the rough round the edges Ripley we were beginning to see in Alien 3 except this one has a wicked sense of humour which I think I like!

It’s quite an odd film and even though I like the story and where it goes, it’s still just bonkers but just about pulls it off.

In a nutshell - Its Alien Jim, but not as we know it.

HannahI think Sigourney Weaver was as fed up by Aliens as I am by the time she made this film. She appears to have lost her mind and acts like a crazy person throughout. I enjoyed this comical turn a lot.

The alien/human baby thing at the end being sucked out of the window by its innards made me shed a tear…
If all of humanity is represented by the characters on this ship then it probably wouldn't be a bad thing if Aliens did take over.


Scores:

Alien 3 (1992)

Date Watched: Friday 21st February 2014




KamI’m always going to be forgiving to Alien 3 as it was made by David Fincher, my joint favourite director.  Given that Alien 3 is known to have suffered problems during production with the first time director not being given total control, it’s not surprising that it’s not very good but I would always argue that there are some flashes of good in there as a result of Fincher’s influence and style.

It feels almost like a remake of Alien. It’s slow and isolated and there is only one Xenomorph providing Ripley with a headache (or should that be chest ache?). The most interesting part of this film is Ripley’s character development. She’s no longer the reluctant heroine of the first two instalments, rather she is now a confident and focused leader taking charge of a group of supposedly tough and dangerous men when they prove to be pretty useless in comparison.

That’s it really, not a lot to say. It’s not great but it has interesting parts and thankfully Fincher went on to do much much much better things!


In a nutshell- Better then Alien vs Predator


HannahThe beginning with everyone from the previous film being dead was a bit sloppy/lazy. And the Alien/Dog CGI thing? Terrible.  
I loved the shaven head look. However I didn’t realise the reason for the look was so ridiculous… a rampant head lice epidemic. If everyone on the planet has a shaven head,  where are these lice hiding? Maybe they should be shaving other areas.

I’m not sure of the unnecessary Tywin Lannister bonking either… Although that at least explains the medieval setting.

Scores:



Wednesday, 19 February 2014

Aliens (1986)

Date watched: Thursday 13th February 2014


Kam: This film is directly responsible for my fear of spiders. I first saw it when I was around 11 years old. I had not seen Alien at this point so this was my first experience of the Alien universe and the facehuggers scared the living crap out of me. Ever since then, anything with more than 4 legs can do one.
Saying that, this film is just brilliant. Exhilarating, action packed, funny, tense and scary all at the same time and I would gladly watch this film every day for the rest of my life.
The Queen Alien reveal is still stunning and the line ‘Get Away From Her You Bitch!’ is the perfect precursor to one of my favourite cinematic fights. As you might be able to tell, I like this film , I like it a lot.
In a nutshell- IT ROCKS!!! (As Vasquez might say)

Hannah: Much better than Alien, at least stuff actually happens. It also caused me to make lots of sounds at the TV which did not involve snoring (it's behind you etc etc).  It’s a bit ruined by the stupid ending, and I feel very sorry for the Alien Queen. I don’t think anyone would react well to letting someone get away only to have them turn back around and set all their babies on fire. What morals are these! I would have been quite happy to see Ripley sucked out of the airlock after that. She also never even apologised to Robot man for having such a prejudice for his kind. I've also realised that I get Sigourney Weaver confused with Susan Sarandon a lot. But this is irrelevant.

 Scores:


Alien (1979)

Date Watched: Tuesday 11th February 2014


Kam: It’s hard to write about a film that is so well known and that we've all seen so many times already. All I can say really is that my opinion hasn't changed- it’s still awesome in its slow and creeping way. Unfortunately, on viewing this time, I was distracted quite heavily by the arrival of my new Gopro camera so my attention wasn't fully on the film. I know, I know, shame on me.
Despite this, I still managed to pay far more attention to it then Hannah did who was fast asleep for about 75% of it. I will remember this for when we come to watch one of her titles such as Twilight or the dreaded Sex and the City, I will survive by having a nap.
In a nutshell- In space, no one can hear Hannah snore.

Hannah: As Kam repeatedly pointed out, I did fall asleep during this film. I stayed awake long enough to watch the alien rip out of John Hurt’s belly, and then dosed all the way until Ripley’s prancing around in her underwear.
It’s definitely not one of my favourites, probably because it’s very slow, and I really don’t care that everyone dies.
Kam; unfortunately you will have to remain awake for ‘dreaded Twilight’ because you haven’t seen it yet… I have already seen Alien. These are the rules.
It’s hardly my fault that I was not entertained, and that by skipping the middle part all I missed was uninteresting characters creeping around a spaceship. Pretty impressed with Jones’ acting however, he can have 5 stars. I was also a bit horrified that it might be possible to kill someone by shoving a rolled up magazine in their mouth.

Scores:

Thursday, 13 February 2014

A Good Day to Die Hard (2013)

Date watched: Sunday 9th February 2014


And so it begins...

Kam: My first reservation around kicking off our quest with this title was over whether we should be filing this under 'A', 'G'or even a 'D'. As (surprisingly) this is the only 'Die Hard' DVD we own, I ruled out filing it under 'D' as this would only work if we owned other titles in the series which would all go under the grouping of 'Die Hard' then filed in release order.
I decided against filing it under 'G' for 'Good' because 'Good Day To Die Hard, A' just sounds silly (and a bit Canadian).
I realise all of the above is incredibly boring but you know what, thinking about where to file this film is far more interesting then watching it.
In a nutshell: Not so much Dying Hard but Dying Slowly and Painfully


Hannah: This film was shit. It didn't even fulfill it's title... Unless it's a good day for loads of random Russians to die. Catchy.
Not the best of starts for this mission...

Scores:




This is what boredom at home leads to

In an effort to avoid the inevitable argument over which film we should watch together, we have decided to remove the choice by working through our DVD collection in alphabetical order.

Subscribing to the big 3 on demand movie services has resulted in many an evening spent trawling through all the titles and not being able to agree on one. This commonly ends with Hannah picking up her book and Kam playing Halo instead.

The solution to this was staring us in the face the whole time. Why pay a monthly subscription when we have already paid good money to fill a DVD rack with a healthy and varied collection of  over 250 films crossing all genres and era's?

With an empowering cancellation of our subscriptions (apart from one), the Movie Luddites was born. We refuse new technologies and embrace the traditional ways, the good old DVD.

We've decided to make this blog about our efforts, not that we assume you care and not that we even care if you care. This blog will serve as our record of what we have watched, when we watched it and what we thought of it at the time. If you find some entertainment from it then more power to you comrades.

**SPOILER ALERT**
In accordance with Kermode and Mayo's rules on spoilers- if a film is more than 10 years old we have no obligation to hide plot points or alert you to 'spoilers'.
You have been warned...